Big Tech

DOJ smacks Google with antitrust lawsuit

Today, the Department of Justice smacks Google with an antitrust lawsuit that claims the big tech giant engages in anticompetitive behavior to hold a monopoly over search and online advertising.

The Department of Justice (DOJ) has charged Google with “unlawfully maintaining monopolies in the markets for general search services, search advertising, and general search text advertising in the United States through anticompetitive and exclusionary practices” in violation of Section 2 of the Sherman Act.

In particular, the Complaint alleges that Google has unlawfully maintained monopolies in search and search advertising by:

  • Entering into exclusivity agreements that forbid preinstallation of any competing search service.
  • Entering into tying and other arrangements that force preinstallation of its search applications in prime locations on mobile devices and make them undeletable, regardless of consumer preference.
  • Entering into long-term agreements with Apple that require Google to be the default – and de facto exclusive – general search engine on Apple’s popular Safari browser and other Apple search tools.
  • Generally using monopoly profits to buy preferential treatment for its search engine on devices, web browsers, and other search access points, creating a continuous and self-reinforcing cycle of monopolization.

Senator Josh Hawley described the move by the DOJ and 11 state attorneys general as “the most important antitrust case in a generation.”

Hawley, who is one of the biggest critics of big tech on Capitol Hill, added that “Google and its fellow Big Tech monopolists exercise unprecedented power over the lives of ordinary Americans, controlling everything from the news we read to the security of our most personal information.

“And Google in particular has gathered and maintained that power through illegal means.”

The federal antitrust lawsuit coming from the DOJ comes in addition to the ongoing antitrust investigations by multiple attorneys general against Google.

Google CEO Sundar Pichai is slated to appear before the Senate Commerce Committee on October 28, along with Twitter CEO Jack Dorsey and Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg, to give testimony on Section 230.

The three CEOs gave testimony on anti-competitive allegations to the House Judiciary Committee less than three months ago, along with Apple CEO Tim Cook.

During the July 29 hearing, Rep David Cicilline told Pichai, “As Google became the gateway to the internet, it began to abuse its power. It used its surveillance over web traffic to identify competitive threats and crush them.

“It has dampened innovation and new business growth, and it has dramatically increased the price of accessing users on the internet, virtually ensuring that any business that wants to be found on the web must pay Google a tax.”

This week, the Senate Judiciary Committee is also considering authorizing subpoenas for both Dorsey and Zuckerberg to give testimony about censoring articles by the New York Post.

Last month, the DOJ sent two reform proposals to Congress regarding Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act of 1996:

  • Promoting Transparency and Open Discourse
  • Addressing Illicit Activity Online

“Ensuring that the internet is a safe, but also vibrant, open and competitive environment is vitally important to America,” said US Attorney General William Barr, in a public statement at the time.

“We therefore urge Congress to make these necessary reforms to Section 230 and begin to hold online platforms accountable both when they unlawfully censor speech and when they knowingly facilitate criminal activity online,” he added.

Tim Hinchliffe

The Sociable editor Tim Hinchliffe covers tech and society, with perspectives on public and private policies proposed by governments, unelected globalists, think tanks, big tech companies, defense departments, and intelligence agencies. Previously, Tim was a reporter for the Ghanaian Chronicle in West Africa and an editor at Colombia Reports in South America. These days, he is only responsible for articles he writes and publishes in his own name. tim@sociable.co

View Comments

Recent Posts

Ethical Imperatives: Should We Embrace AI?

Five years ago, Frank Chen posed a question that has stuck with me every day…

4 days ago

The Tech Company Brief by HackerNoon: A Clash with the Mainstream Media

What happens when the world's richest man gets caught in the crosshairs of one of…

4 days ago

New Synop app provides Managed Access Charging functionality to EV fleets

As companies that operate large vehicle fleets make the switch to electric vehicles (EVs), a…

5 days ago

‘Predictive government’ is key to ‘govtech utopia’: Saudi official to IMF

A predictive government utopia would be a dystopian nightmare for constitutional republics: perspective Predictive government…

6 days ago

Nilekani, Carstens propose digital ID, CBDC-powered ‘Finternet’ to be ‘the future financial system’: BIS report

The finternet will merge into digital public infrastructure where anonymity is abolished, money is programmable…

2 weeks ago

Upwork’s Mystery Suspensions: Why Are High-Earning Clients Affected?

After more than ten years on Elance / oDesk / Upwork, I dare to say…

2 weeks ago