Oracle breaks with tech industry to back sex trafficking legislation

Cloud computing behemoth Oracle has broken off from the standard tech sector line and decided to back a bipartisan proposal in the US Congress that would make it easier to penalize operators of websites that facilitate online sex trafficking.

The technology sector has, thus far, been firmly opposed to the legislation on the grounds that it would strangle innovation and lead to endless litigation.

“Your legislation does not, as suggested by the bill’s opponents, usher the end of the internet,” Kenneth Glueck, Oracle senior vice president, wrote in a letter to Republican Senator Rob Portman and Democratic Senator Richard Blumenthal, chief architects of the proposal. “If enacted, it will establish some measure of accountability for those that cynically sell advertising but are unprepared to help curtail sex trafficking,” he continued.

The legislation would open up the potential for state legislators and victims to pursue legal action against Facebook, Google and other big tech giants if their measures to limit exploitative material are found to be insufficient.

This news came at the same time a new report was released which showed that tech entrepreneurs generally have very Democratic values, except when it comes to regulation. The report from the Stanford Business School suggested that when it comes to regulation tech entrepreneurs are as right-wing as Republican party donors, while being as left-wing as Democrat party donors on almost every other issue.

That being said, it would be fair to suggest that regulation has the potential to unduly affect the tech sector. It’s a sector often misunderstood by those less “tech-savvy”, who may well be lawmakers, and the pace of innovation is firstly very high and secondly part of the sectors identity. But while this might explain the sectors adversity to regulation it does not speak to how valid any individual regulation might be.

One point to consider in the latest case is that Oracle and Google have been rivals in a lawsuit that lasted six years – or seven, depending on whether you think it’s still going. Oracle runs cloud-based CRM-type systems for businesses to store data and processes, so is unlikely to be much affected by legislation which speaks to consumer advertising. It is conceivable that this move from Oracle is just the latest in its propensity to try and stitch up Google.

Ben Allen

Ben Allen is a traveller, a millennial and a Brit. He worked in the London startup world for a while but really prefers commenting on it than working in it. He has huge faith in the tech industry and enjoys talking and writing about the social issues inherent in its development.

Recent Posts

G20 South Africa commits to advancing digital public infrastructure globally

DPI involves giving everybody electricity & internet, making them sign up for digital ID, and…

1 day ago

Nisum, Applied AI Consulting partner-up to turn the promise of AI into tangible results

Across industries, AI has been promised as the magic bullet, poised to solve different business…

2 days ago

WEF blog calls for an ‘International Cybercrime Coordination Authority’ to impose collective penalties on uncooperative nations

How long until online misinformation and disinformation are considered cybercrimes? perspective The World Economic Forum…

2 days ago

With surge in AI-generated code creates security concerns, DeepSources launches trio of autonomous AI agents for DevSecOps 

Autonomous, AI-powered employees are set to begin roaming corporate networks sooner than expected, marking the…

5 days ago

As carcinogenic chemicals from cleaning products hit the headlines, Viking Pure Solutions is protecting employees from harm

Despite the ongoing fight to reduce, reuse and recycle plastics, when it comes to environmental…

5 days ago

Muddy Waters vs. AppLovin: Why Investors Might Be the Real Target

Muddy Waters’ recent short report on AppLovin reads serious. Abuse, violations, an impending takedown. But…

6 days ago