Social Media

US Senator wants answers from Dorsey on Twitter breach that appears to be inside job

Twitter says it doesn’t shadowban but leaked screenshots of alleged admin tool point to trends & search blacklisting

On the day of what appears to be the largest breach in Twitter’s history, US Senator Josh Hawley pens an open letter to Twitter CEO Jack Dorsey asking him to explain what happened as fingers point to Twitter employees involved in the scam.

Yesterday, high profile accounts on Twitter were compromised and taken over in an apparent bitcoin-related scam, although the full scale of the attack has yet to be publicly assessed.

The Twitter accounts affected by the breach included those of Barack Obama, Joe Biden, Elon Musk, Bill Gates, Jeff Bezos, and others.

On Wednesday Senator Hawley called on Twitter to work with the FBI and DOJ to better secure its platform and asked that Dorsey answer the following questions:

  • Did this event represent a breach of users’ own account security or of Twitter’s systems?
  • Were accounts protected by two-factor authentication successfully targeted in this breach? If so, how was this possible?
  • Did this breach compromise the account security of users whose accounts were not used to share fraudulent posts? If so, how many accounts were affected? Were all accounts’ security compromised by this breach?
  • How many users may have faced data theft as a consequence of this breach?
  • What measures does Twitter undertake to prevent system-level hacks from breaching the security of its entire userbase?
  • Did this attack threaten the security of the President’s own Twitter account?

Shortly after Twitter acknowledged the “security incident” all blue-checked accounts were temporarily suspended from tweeting on Wednesday evening.

Fingers point to an inside job

In a bizarre turn of events, Joseph Cox wrote in Motherboard that the bitcoin heist was allegedly made possible by a Twitter employee who helped the scammers pull it off.

Cox wrote that Motherboard was in contact with “two sources who took over accounts,” with one source declaring, “We used a rep that literally done all the work for us.”

The second source said that the Twitter employee was paid to take over the high profile accounts.

Backing up these claims, Twitter issued a statement saying that it believes some of its employees with access to internal systems and tools were successfully targeted.

Statements from the anonymous sources, along with screenshots obtained by Motherboard, suggest that Twitter employees on the inside were able to access the high-profile accounts using an internal tool at Twitter.

Screenshots expose more evidence of Twitter shadowbanning with ‘Trends’ & ‘Search’ blacklists

Screenshots of the alleged internal tool, if proven to be authentic, raise even more alarm bells about the inner workings of the platform.

The screenshots showed colored buttons, on two of which were written, “Trends Blacklist” and “Search Blacklist.”

Twitter has long claimed not to shadow ban, and the public isn’t privy to what exact trends and searches may be blacklisted, but seeing buttons for blacklisting trends and searches is concerning to many users with serious questions about the platform’s integrity.

Twitter tells you straight up, “We do not shadow ban,” but Twitter admits to making content more difficult to find, which in my opinion sounds like a part of shadowbanning.

“You are always able to see the tweets from accounts you follow (although you may have to do more work to find them, like go directly to their profile). And we certainly don’t shadow ban based on political viewpoints or ideology,” reads a Twitter blog post from 2018 (emphasis mine).

Wednesday’s Twitter breach exposed not only how vulnerable the platform is and how its own employees could compromise the account of a presidential candidate, but that Twitter may also have been misleading the public about its policies with questions arising over blacklistings.

Tim Hinchliffe

The Sociable editor Tim Hinchliffe covers tech and society, with perspectives on public and private policies proposed by governments, unelected globalists, think tanks, big tech companies, defense departments, and intelligence agencies. Previously, Tim was a reporter for the Ghanaian Chronicle in West Africa and an editor at Colombia Reports in South America. These days, he is only responsible for articles he writes and publishes in his own name. tim@sociable.co

Recent Posts

Ethical Imperatives: Should We Embrace AI?

Five years ago, Frank Chen posed a question that has stuck with me every day…

4 days ago

The Tech Company Brief by HackerNoon: A Clash with the Mainstream Media

What happens when the world's richest man gets caught in the crosshairs of one of…

4 days ago

New Synop app provides Managed Access Charging functionality to EV fleets

As companies that operate large vehicle fleets make the switch to electric vehicles (EVs), a…

5 days ago

‘Predictive government’ is key to ‘govtech utopia’: Saudi official to IMF

A predictive government utopia would be a dystopian nightmare for constitutional republics: perspective Predictive government…

6 days ago

Nilekani, Carstens propose digital ID, CBDC-powered ‘Finternet’ to be ‘the future financial system’: BIS report

The finternet will merge into digital public infrastructure where anonymity is abolished, money is programmable…

2 weeks ago

Upwork’s Mystery Suspensions: Why Are High-Earning Clients Affected?

After more than ten years on Elance / oDesk / Upwork, I dare to say…

2 weeks ago