Categories: Social Media

The Simpsons’ Apu ‘debate’ pinches political correctness nerve

Over the weekend, Indiewire reported that The Simpsons would be quietly phasing out it’s most controversial character, Apu, causing the internet to stir in protest. However, the show’s executive producer, Al Jean, refuted the claim in a tweet, referencing the source of the leak: Adi Sankar, the producer of the Netflix anime series “Castlevania.”

Several months ago, Sankar solicited ideas from his Youtube subscribers, for an episode that “subverts [Apu], pivots him, writes him out, or evolves him,” he told Indiewire.

In the same interview, Sankar cited several unnamed sources who worked on the show that told him that Fox was considering dropping Apu altogether.

“They aren’t going to make a big deal out of it, or anything like that, but they’ll drop him altogether just to avoid the controversy,” Sankar said.

Despite Jean’s dismissal of Sankar’s claim, campaigns to #SaveApu surfaced on Twitter, reviving a long debate about political correctness and satire.

Apu has been an integral character on The Simpsons for over three decades. The catch phrase he uses to bid farewell to his customers, “Thank you, come again,” secured itself in 90s pop culture lingo making him as much a part of The Simpsons universe as his Kwik-E-Mart clientele; however, controversy lies in whether or not the character, voiced by Hank Azaria, a white man, plays into racist tropes.

Comedian Hari Kondablou addresses these questions head-on in his in his documentary, The Problem with Apu.

Perhaps what’s most interesting about the “debate” is that both sides of the argument about stereotypes in satire seem to fall in agreement that Apu should not be removed. The prime example of criticism of the alleged decision comes from Kondablou himself:

But even within the camp of the #SaveApu, people have very different reasons to keep him alive:

Until Fox explicitly denies that Apu has been wiped from The Simpsons, the debate will continue to wage on, moving away from whether or not the network should remove Apu, but what they should do with his character if they keep him.

Jordan Jones

Jordan T. Jones is a writer and social media editor who lives in Medellin, Colombia. He is interested in the diverse ways that society creates and responds to culture. The Atlanta-native is a Fulbright scholar, former associate editor at The Atlantic, and amateur salsa dancer.

View Comments

Recent Posts

G20 South Africa commits to advancing digital public infrastructure globally

DPI involves giving everybody electricity & internet, making them sign up for digital ID, and…

24 hours ago

Nisum, Applied AI Consulting partner-up to turn the promise of AI into tangible results

Across industries, AI has been promised as the magic bullet, poised to solve different business…

2 days ago

WEF blog calls for an ‘International Cybercrime Coordination Authority’ to impose collective penalties on uncooperative nations

How long until online misinformation and disinformation are considered cybercrimes? perspective The World Economic Forum…

2 days ago

With surge in AI-generated code creates security concerns, DeepSources launches trio of autonomous AI agents for DevSecOps 

Autonomous, AI-powered employees are set to begin roaming corporate networks sooner than expected, marking the…

5 days ago

As carcinogenic chemicals from cleaning products hit the headlines, Viking Pure Solutions is protecting employees from harm

Despite the ongoing fight to reduce, reuse and recycle plastics, when it comes to environmental…

5 days ago

Muddy Waters vs. AppLovin: Why Investors Might Be the Real Target

Muddy Waters’ recent short report on AppLovin reads serious. Abuse, violations, an impending takedown. But…

6 days ago