Categories: Social Media

The Simpsons’ Apu ‘debate’ pinches political correctness nerve

Over the weekend, Indiewire reported that The Simpsons would be quietly phasing out it’s most controversial character, Apu, causing the internet to stir in protest. However, the show’s executive producer, Al Jean, refuted the claim in a tweet, referencing the source of the leak: Adi Sankar, the producer of the Netflix anime series “Castlevania.”

Several months ago, Sankar solicited ideas from his Youtube subscribers, for an episode that “subverts [Apu], pivots him, writes him out, or evolves him,” he told Indiewire.

In the same interview, Sankar cited several unnamed sources who worked on the show that told him that Fox was considering dropping Apu altogether.

“They aren’t going to make a big deal out of it, or anything like that, but they’ll drop him altogether just to avoid the controversy,” Sankar said.

Despite Jean’s dismissal of Sankar’s claim, campaigns to #SaveApu surfaced on Twitter, reviving a long debate about political correctness and satire.

Apu has been an integral character on The Simpsons for over three decades. The catch phrase he uses to bid farewell to his customers, “Thank you, come again,” secured itself in 90s pop culture lingo making him as much a part of The Simpsons universe as his Kwik-E-Mart clientele; however, controversy lies in whether or not the character, voiced by Hank Azaria, a white man, plays into racist tropes.

Comedian Hari Kondablou addresses these questions head-on in his in his documentary, The Problem with Apu.

Perhaps what’s most interesting about the “debate” is that both sides of the argument about stereotypes in satire seem to fall in agreement that Apu should not be removed. The prime example of criticism of the alleged decision comes from Kondablou himself:

But even within the camp of the #SaveApu, people have very different reasons to keep him alive:

Until Fox explicitly denies that Apu has been wiped from The Simpsons, the debate will continue to wage on, moving away from whether or not the network should remove Apu, but what they should do with his character if they keep him.

Jordan Jones

Jordan T. Jones is a writer and social media editor who lives in Medellin, Colombia. He is interested in the diverse ways that society creates and responds to culture. The Atlanta-native is a Fulbright scholar, former associate editor at The Atlantic, and amateur salsa dancer.

View Comments

Recent Posts

Consciousness computing tech exists, ‘whoever governs identity governs society’: World Forum

Neural rights was a hot topic during a session called "Approaching Singularity: Our Brains Interfacing…

22 hours ago

Decision Points: The “Tiger” Methodology for Decisive Action

At some point in the last 10 years, I started viewing Colonel John Boyd as…

5 days ago

Architecting Zero-Click AI Eval Pipelines

When I started designing an AI Evaluation pipeline/framework at my organization, I had no idea…

5 days ago

Tech executive Bob Reisenweber named Director of Operations at Source Meridian

This week software firm Source Meridian announced that Bob Reisenweber was named its new Director…

1 week ago

Beyond big tech: These 26 leaders are writing the next chapter of AI 

The early wave of AI disruption focused on the tech's ability to work as a…

1 week ago

DARPA Generative Optogenetics (GO) program gathers biosecurity, regulatory advisers for commercializing programmable biology tech

DARPA GO could be used for human performance enhancement & bioengineered super-soldiers, along with the…

1 week ago